Read our detailed comparison of the Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE vs Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. For landscape astrophotography mainly - but would be nice to use it for traditional landscape as well as I am headed to Tuscany, Italy shortly. Smooth operation? 63 mm vs 77 mm: 14 mm smaller in diameter: Reasons to choose Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM over Rokinon 35mm f1.4. This thread is archived. With the Sony, you always have to give the ring a half-turn to travel from infinity to the minimum focus distance. Since we had both the Sigma and Sony in for testing at the same time, we decided to put them head-to-head to find out just what the differences are between them! Rokinon has just released a 16mm T2.2 wide-angle cine lens designed for APS-C and Micro Four Thirds cameras. Thankfully, the field curvature isn’t quite as noticeable at infinity. Although the Sigma is visibly larger, it is also worth pointing out that it is very lightweight for this type of lens. Here the Sony lens is at its sharpest between f/8 and f/11, while the Sigma peaks at f/5.6. Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Usually your post-production software will automatically apply the appropriate profile but it is always worth double checking, just in case it fails to do so. To know more about our ethics, you can visit our full disclosure page. Generally favorable optical performance? Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN (Sony E-mount) The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Yet again, fast wide-angles tend to suffer from at least some distortion. Turning to the corners, we can see the Sony’s performance deteriorate even further, especially at the fastest apertures. The XP 50mm F1.2 lens for Canon EF Mount has officially arrived. The Sigma is currently only available in black whereas the Sony lens comes in black or silver. To put it simply, I got the Rokinon 16mm three years ago to learn how to work within the field of view of a real wide-angle lens. . At just under .66 feet/.2 meters, you can get really close to subjects for some interesting shots. The Sony features a lightweight aluminium alloy finish. The lens is fantastic. As for manual focusing, I find the experience more frustrating with the Sony lens, not only because the fly-by-wire focus ring is so much stiffer than that of the Sigma but also because it is very difficult to judge the focus, even with magnification activated on the screen. Before we get to the direct comparisons, however, there are two things we wanted to direct your attention to as you may have missed it while wading through the many scenes on the previous page. we’ll see. Reply to thread Reply with quote Complain. Change Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. gear1box • … I have a nikon D300 with cropped sensor at the moment and am quite happy with it! The Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4SP. More to come on that unique lens soon. The four lenses in this review all come with essentially the same components within their branded containers: Lens; Front Lens Cap; Rear Lens Cap; Lens Case; Various Paperwork/Booklets; Lens Serial/Proof of Ownership Card; Lens Specific Instruction Manual; Warranty Card/Information; With all … If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. I find myself using 16mm wide angle most of the time. Detailed … The Rokinon 16mm f/2 sports a rather large front element for a wide-angle, so it is bound to catch a lot of stray light. When a subject is within the plane of focus, however, this humble prime produces sharp results. At f/2, expect to start with a +85 amount and 10 midpoint, at f/2.8 a +60 amount and 20 midpoint, at f/4 a +40 amount and 25 midpoint, and any smaller aperture a +30 amount and 30 midpoint. The Rokinon 16mm is no exception, especially being an APS-c lens. This effect is most noticeable at wide apertures, but can still be seen at the pixel level at f/5.6. Interestingly, while the Sigma clearly has an advantage at f/2.8 (and f/1.4 to a lesser degree), the two lenses begin to deliver much more similar results once you stop down beyond f/4. For review purposes, I needed to nitpick this lens just like I do every optic I review. Reasons to choose Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE over Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN Sony E-mount. The Sony APS-C range has faced some neglect as of late due to much of Sony’s focus being funnelled into lens development for the extremely popular full-frame FE system. Bought 2 Sigma lenses (this one and 30mm) because of YouTube reviews. This same lens is also currently sold under the Samyang and Bower brand names. As a nice little surprise, out-of-focus highlights at f/2 and f/2.8 actually look pretty decent–the few times one may get to see them in photographs. Lens is available in nearly every mount out there: Canon EF-S, Nikon F, Sony E, Sony α, Fuji X, Samsung NX, Pentax K, Canon M, and m4/3. The difference in rendering becomes even more clear in the following outdoor examples taken on the Aberdyfi pier, where the bokeh of the Sony 16mm is more confusing and less smooth. Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/11. im wondering, does it compare at all to the Rokinon 12mm? If that weren’t enough, the Sigma 16mm digitally corrects optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction, further improving the optical quality. (I like to do severe storm photography and it often gets very dark under them, even in daylight hours.) Oddly, the corners don’t reach peak sharpness until f/8, and even then it isn’t terribly sharp. In spite of its plastic construction, the lens has survived hell and high water both in and out of my camera bag. Site Update: End of 2018 + New Photographer! Anyway, beyond that I’m looking forward to taking delivery of that Laowa 15mm f/2 in September! With all this put together, how does this lens stand up to my four pillars of shootability? I would like to buy my first non-kit lens, and I think the Rokinon 12mm looks like a good option, particularly for astro/landscape. The sigma is a great lens good quality and from what I have read is very close to the canon 15 2.8 but right now the 8-15L still takes the cake as best IQ and this rokinon is ridiculously close and a wee bit better in the corners. Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Specifications. When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking. x. The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 and Sony 16mm f/2.8 have the same focal length which equates to a 24mm equivalent field of view in 35mm terms. Light weight? Surprisingly enough, the large focus ring is buttery smooth and its short focus throw makes quick focus acquisition a breeze. The 16mm is asp-c sensor only and thats me I have a canon 750D. Dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 millimeters wide, 3.42 inches/86 millimeters long, with a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams. Dial it back to f/2.8-4 and subjects really “pop” with decent sharpness to boot. Have you ever wanted to get more of the scene in front of you in the frame than your current lens allows, especially if you don't have room to take a few steps back? Happily, the autofocus of both lenses are very smooth and quiet for both stills and video shooting. Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DG DN Art vs. Samyang/Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 Sigma's new 85mm masterpiece made expressly for mirrorless digital cameras looks to be the new king of 85mm lens options for Sony full-frame e-mount. The 16mm DN is the first Sigma mirrorless lens to include some moisture resistance, which I think very important on a lens that will likely be used for landscape work. Between the two, the Sigma seems to suffer more but this is to be expected from fast lenses. This doesn’t … With either 16mm lens, you can expect to come across some longitudinal chromatic aberration in backlit scenes or high contrast areas of the image at the fastest aperture values. Samyang/Rokinon 12mm F2.0 or Sigma 16mm F1.4 ? Unabashedly a “plastic-fantastic” lens, does the Rokinon 16mm f/2 hold up on the a6500? It seems mechanically sound, and smaller / more simple in design compared to some of the others, so there might be a chance that it survives a little longer. Just because a lens is made specifically for an APS-C body does not mean that its focal length is measured differently, somehow accounting for the smaller image circle utilized by the smaller imaging sensor.A 1.5x or 1.6x multiplier (FOVCF) must be used to determine the full frame angle of view equivalent that many of us think in.Multip… After attempting many, many panoramas with this lens, I recommend staying away from the Rokinon 16mm as a panorama tool. ReddIt. With the Sigma, by comparison, the speed at which you turn the ring affects how quickly you go from one extreme to the other. On the flip side, unlike a slower wide-angle prime (like Voigtlaender’s compact optics), the lens with its huge focus ring actually sits pretty well in the hand! Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/16. An interesting fact about the Sony lens is that it is compatible with two optional converters: the VCL-ECU1 ultra-wide converter (B&H Photo) and VCL-ECF1 fisheye converter (B&H Photo). I find myself using 16mm wide angle most of the time. As mentioned before, however, it is unlikely one will even get corners this sharp out in the world due to field curvature. * In fact, one of the oldest primes for the system is the E 16mm f/2.8, an inexpensive pancake lens haunted by something of a mixed reputation. According to the official specifications, the two lenses have a similar minimum focus distance (25cm for the Sigma / 24cm for the Sony). Pros + Well built with tight tolerances + Very compact, including embedded lens hood + Handles and balances very well on any … Comparing them side-by-side in the field reveals that the Sony is ever so slightly wider but the difference is barely worth mentioning. The former affects the straight out-of-camera JPGs while the latter influences the look of the RAW files. There are few wide-angle primes out there for APS-c cameras, especially those with fast apertures. i want to do night-caps that include foreground and the Milky way. 100% Upvoted. By f/2.8 it reduces to about a half pixel wide, and by f/4 it is completely gone. Last updated: June 14, 2018 Go to Comments. Lens to replace . I have taken two photos (four in total) so that the … In regards to field curvature, flare, vignetting, and distortion, you bet! The Rokinon 16mm is designed to be a budget-friendly, decent performing lens. 77 mm vs 83 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Filter Thread: 62 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical over Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM. This is a great lens for ultra-wide angle shots of the Milky Way, starscapes and time-lapse animations. Sony 16mm with UWC vs Rokinon/Samyang 12mm? Compare Sigma 16mm f 1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Sony E vs Rokinon 12mm f 2.0 NCS CS Lens for Sony E-Mount Black vs Rokinon 8mm f 2.8 UMC Fisheye II Lens for Sony E Black vs Sony E 16mm f 2.8 Lens Silver First one is whether to go with the Rokinon 24mm and 35mm cine lenses OR the sigma 18/35 mm f/1.8 ? Even at this aperture and focal length, there is still a fair bit of subject separation from the background. I did initially wonder whether my Sony 16mm sample had a problem but others reviews of the lens have also confirmed that the performance at f/2.8 is disappointing. The only physical control you’ll find on the barrels of the two lenses is a ridged fly-by-wire focus ring, which we’ll discuss in more detail in the autofocus/manual focus section below. The Rokinon 16mm shows a fair amount of barrel distortion that isn’t quite uniform. Intercontinental Yokohama Grand16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/3200, Steaming Street Sculpture16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1600. The second of the two zooms, this one-of-a-kind zoom came home with this report card: Pros + Very well built and attractive, minimalist design + Compact despite extremely wide 2x zoom range + Excellent center sharpness from wide open + Quick, accurate, and silent autofocus + Autofocus … The Sony lens may not come bundled with a hood but according to Imaging Resource, the hood for the 18-55mm lens is compatible. There’s a lot of bulkiness to the Rokinon 16mm that lends it to take up a big chunk in one’s camera bag. New comments cannot be posted … The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. Some more obvious than others. Those reviews on YouTube were spot on. E-mount wide-angle comparison of the Sigma 16mm f1.4 and Sony 10-18mm f4 as well as other competitors. For the $270 I spent on it, it has been an invaluable tool for multiple events (both paid and volunteer), in-the-moment low-light shots, and general travel photographs that didn’t necessarily need to be perfect at the pixel level. I don’t often make sweeping statements about sharpness, as the differences between lenses are often quite subtle, but in the case of these two primes, I can say beyond the shadow of a doubt that the Sigma is much sharper and has better contrast at all aperture values up to f/4. Coming in at a hefty 405 grams, I’d say it’s not a light lens but does it make up for that in terms of quality? Also regarding the weight, it’s no slouch either. It has a very small rubber gasket near the lens mount and Sigma calls it “dust and splash-proof”, which suggests some further sealing internally. As is common with wide-angles, the Rokinon 16mm exhibits a bit of lateral chromatic aberration in the corners at f/2-2.8, but with the aforementioned field curvature, corners at this aperture will rarely be in focus to show this effect anyway. By f/4 the aperture starts creating a hard ring around the outside of the highlight and at f/5.6 some annoying artifacts rear their head within most highlights. The focus ring is rubber, like the older version, but doesn’t have the grippy ridges of the old … The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. The story would be different if this were a 16mm f/1, but that is neither here or there. Below is a 100% crop of the same building used in last review’s infinity focus test. Though the lens produces many reflections, they are always very small. Work would be landscape, real estate, arsto. BUY from B&H PHOTO. amzn_assoc_marketplace = "amazon"; Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/11. Pinterest. Rokinon 16mm F2.0 High Speed Wide angle The 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens from Rokinon is a manual focus wide-angle lens compatible with APS-C format DSLR digital cameras. Note: the code above is invalidwhen the software is on pre-order. Rokinon 16mm f/2 Lens Review for Astrophotography - posted in DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging: Here’s my in-depth review of the Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS Lens for astrophotography. The front element is also larger, which probably accounts for the extra 200 … (In Lightroom, you can do this by going to the Lens Corrections tab on the right.). As a fast lens at a low price, I expected the Rokinon 16mm to have issues with chromatic aberrations at wide apertures. Castle and Samurai Fun16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000. More precisely, the two lenses that I am going to compare are the Irix 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone and the Rokinon (Samyang) ... Focal Length: 14mm vs 15mm A photographer in a forum once told me that 1 mm in this focal length is a lot and that it is not the same having a 14mm as a 15mm focal length. Note that the building looks enlarged and skewed in the corner shot due to perspective distortion, common in all wide-angles. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. So that usage is of secondary concern, but for that I would prefer the extra wide FOV of the 14mm over the 16mm. A primary reason to want this lens is because it has a 14mm focal length and the focal length largely determines the type of photography a (or any) lens is used for.The ultra-wide 114° angle of view presented by the 14mm focal length is both very useful and extremely fun to use. Lucky for you, I’ve owned the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 lens for over 3 years and the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 for over 2 … Read our detailed comparison of the Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. save hide report. Because great photographs don't make themselves. amzn_assoc_linkid = "0d1830809aceb8a8dccff6e1a38a13db"; Focal Length - Wide: 24mm vs 30mm: 6mm wider coverage : Length: mm vs 59 mm: 59 mm shorter: Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC HSM vs Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Specs Table. Tumblr. The Rokinon 16mm doesn’t provide a very consistent performance as the focus distance changes. If you have an Sony a6500 with IBIS, then get the Sigma 16mm 1.4 and 30mm 1.4 - … F/5.6 gives the sharpest results, which actually turns out to be decently sharp, with good contrast to boot. share. This is the moment you've been waiting for, the full in depth review of the Sigma 16mm 1.4, i've tackled all aspects of this lens. With the same optical formula as in their 16mm f/2.0 AS UMC CS Lens, the 16mm T2.2 is a fast, full-manual-control … All in all, centers show no serious issues. … In fact, it’s so sharp, its extreme corners actually look better than the absolutely massive (and even more expensive) Sigma 14mm f/1.8, even when the Sigma is stopped down … So, about three years ago I scrounged around for a deal on a used Rokinon 16mm f/2. In addition, there are half-stops in between each aperture click, and it too operates without fuss. Sigma 16mm, 30mm, and 56mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lenses Bundle for Sony E with Lens Case and Double 64 Extreme Pro SD Cards (7 Items) $1,117.00: Get the deal: General info. When it comes to sheer resolving power, the bigger and pricier Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP (aka, the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP) is a champion. Victoria Peak Overlook16mm, f/4, ISO 100, 1/1600. By f/5.6 the lateral aberrations are not as noticeable. Full Name: Rokinon 16mm f/2 ED AS UMC CS Dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 millimeters wide, 3.42 inches/86 millimeters long, with a moderate weight of 20 ounces/571 grams. Will help with noise and exposure times compared to the Rokinon. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. As always, if you are unfamiliar with my lens review style, check this post first! Samyang AF 18mm F2.8 FE. Provided you nail focus exactly–this can occasionally be difficult without magnification–purple fringing is nothing to worry about and is easy to correct. The upcoming Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero-D looks great, though it is substantially more expensive, is E-mount only, and also covers a full-frame sensor. However, there are likely better options out there for architectural shots that don’t require as much editing. Looking more closely at the out-of-focus areas and bokeh quality, we can see that the bokeh balls produced by the Sigma between f/1.4 and f/2 are much larger and cleaner than those of the Sony at f/2.8. This makes sense though, as the Sony, which is classified as a pancake lens, has fewer optical elements and a slower maximum aperture of f/2.8. 15mm Laowa vs. Rokinon 14mm SP vs. Sigma Art 14mm – Comparing the left side of the image for vignetting (light fall-off), wide open and stopped down. That said, even without testing the lenses side-by-side, we know that the Sigma should deliver more eye-catching results because its maximum aperture is two stops faster. The truth is that the difference exists. Yet, with the recently announced Sigma 16mm F1.4, I'm wondering if I should just wait and get that. Above, I compare the vignetting of the three lenses, both wide open and when stopped down. This is due to the Sigma having more focus breathing when focusing at the shortest distance. Introduced in 2017 are two fast ultra-wide 14mm lenses, from Sigma… ©2018 Alan Dyer. The Sigma lenses are superb. Returning to the scene we used for the field of view comparison, we can see that the Sony lens produces a slightly cooler rendering than the Sigma. Rokinon 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX Tokina AT-X Pro 11-16mm f/2.8 DX II. I'm more of a vacation/amateur photographer, so i'd only like to make the wide angle lens purchase once. Following angle of view analysis, this section will be dedicated to assessing distortion. Below you can see a couple of the worst examples I encountered during my testing period. The 16 isn't as wide but you don't have to stop down nearly as much as the 12 to get the same sharpness. If size and weight are important to you, one of the first differences you’ll certainly notice is just how much smaller and lighter the Sony lens is in comparison to the Sigma. Yes! Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Although it was APS-c only, 16mm is still decently wide and f/2 is a nice aperture for low-light handheld shots. If you decide to manually correct it, a +6 correction should get you close enough to the lens profile. As such, I can gladly say this is one travel lens that can safely easily be used, but hardly abused. Detailed comparison of specifications. Up until recently, the Sony 16mm f/2.8 pancake lens was the only option Sony E-mount users had if they wanted a 24mm equivalent prime (35mm format) with autofocus. It … Change ), You are commenting using your Google account. Note that the same picture profile (Standard) and white balance (5600K) was used for both images and the light conditions did not change between shots. Bouquet16mm, ISO 100, f/2, 1/80As with any fast lens, corner sharpness doesn’t mean much when the corners aren’t going to be in focus anyway. Almost. Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. First, here are … Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Pentax 10-17mm FE Rating. Stop the Sigma down to match the f/2.8 aperture and we find that despite having a similar size, the bokeh balls of the Sigma – in addition to featuring fewer “onion rings” – assume the symmetrical shape of the 9-blade aperture. Throw in the field curvature and one can quickly find themselves finagling settings often in an attempt to get sharp images. The imperfections of Sony E-mount lenses, such as distortion, are either corrected in-camera or via a profile applied in your post production software. Thanks for dropping by! Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/8. Sony E 35mm f/1.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/2.8 vs Sigma 30mm f/1.4, desire a fast-aperture wide-angle prime for close-up work, don’t mind the size of the lens (it fits the a6300/a6500 well but would overwhelm a smaller camera), don’t have a lot of money to spend on lenses at the moment, want a 24mm equivalent lens that is extremely compact and lightweight, mostly plan on shooting landscapes, cityscapes or street at f/5.6 or f/8. In regards to bokeh highlights, it is rare to run across them in photos with the exception of super-close focus. 1. weather-sealed (splashproof) Samyang 35mm f/1.4 AS UMC. Miscellaneous: 8-bladed aperture stopping down to f/22, 77mm filter size, petal-shaped plastic lens hood, manual focus only, 80 degrees of focus rotation, metal mount, pinch-style lens cap, electronic contacts (F-mount version) for EXIF/focus confirmation. I did, however, have decent hopes for its optical performance out in the field. The included lens profile for the Rokinon 16mm improves vignetting slightly, but with straight manual corrections you’ll need to fiddle with the adjustment sliders a lot. So all you see with regard to its function suit my … Click below for full-size crop embedded in the image. Archived. I put two new fast 14mm lenses to the test: the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art vs. the Rokinon 14mm f/2.4 SP. ( Log Out /  Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art vs NEW Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens. Print. ... vs. Fujifilm XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR. The Rokinon is good but it just is bad wide open, that's not ideal for astro. … Focal Length - Wide: 30mm vs 35mm: 5mm wider coverage: Diaphragm Blades: 8 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing : Weight: 430 g vs 660 g: 230 g lighter: Length: 59 mm vs 112 mm: 53 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 62 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller … Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART Lens @ f/16. Looking at my samples with the profile applied, I didn’t find distortion to be an issue with either lens. Although the Sigma is visibly larger, it is also worth pointing out that it is very lightweight for this … Cove Sunset16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/3200, 15 images stitchedThis shot took a lot of editing to correct as a multi-row panorama, Engetsukyo Moon Bridge16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/400, 10 images stitchedMeanwhile, this single-row panorama only required a touch of perspective correction. As I should have expected following the strange infinity focus tests, sharpness peaks at close focus at f/8. Although it does have some advantages, such as an extremely compact construction and a very affordable price point, I admit that everything else about the lens feels outdated, from the optical quality to its AF motor, which isn’t compatible with Sony’s latest PDAF system. Hey guys, I will be buying a Panasonic gh4 along with the new metabones speedboster xl with 0.64 reduction factor, so for the lenses i have two questions. Diaphragm Blades: 9 vs: better Bokeh: Autofocus: Yes vs None: Easier and more accurate focusing: Length: 94 mm vs 112 mm: 18 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 67 mm vs 77 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Rokinon 35mm f1.4 vs Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Specs Table. In particular with this optic, the vignetting issues, slight distortion, field curvature, and lack of cross-frame resolution make multi-row panoramas all but impossible. Might be an important difference on a canon rebel. Not only is the optical quality excellent but it is also well-built, PDAF compatible and benefits from a very fast aperture. A small disclaimer, to be sure: I have shot with the Rokinon 16mm for close to three years now, and it is possible that the bumps and scrapes suffered from multiple outings could have affected the lens’ optical formula a little bit. amzn_assoc_tracking_id = "mlscomp-nsa-20"; From an aesthetics standpoint, which I honestly care almost nothing about, the 14SP is a nice-looking lens and was clearly designed with Zeiss’s external look in mind. As a wide-angle lens on an APS-c camera, to expect noticeable subject separation at any focus distance will only set someone up to be disappointed. For practical purposes, and for the most even cross-frame sharpness, shoot at f/5.6. Second one is that if i went with Rokinon lenses Should i save money and go with old CV series 24 and 35 mm lenses OR the new … But at this price point? Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Distortions. Sony 10-18 f4 vs rokinon 12 f2/ sigma 16 f1.4. Apply the appropriate profiles in a post-production software like Lightroom, however, and it almost completely disappears. Nice! Google+. Now that the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 has arrived on the scene, Sony users finally have a high quality 24mm equivalent prime they can rely on. *There is also a third 16mm prime for the E-mount, the Samyang Rokinon 16mm f/2 manual focus lens. Wide open, all the lenses, even the Sigma and Rokinon … Also, most of it disappears in images taken with the Sigma by f/2.8 but with the Sony at this value, it can occur. It provides a 79.5° angle of view which translates into a 35mm format equivalency of 25.6mm. Both lenses incorporate an internal focus unit, which is driven by an internal stepping motor on the Sigma and a generic AF motor on the Sony. With two aspherical lens elements and one extra-low dispersion … A fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides shallow depth of field. The Sigma does seem to produce a little more barrel distortion than the Sony, but the difference is subtle. Photographing architecture is a popular use for a 14mm lens.Building… Click below for full-size crops. Thankfully Rokinon corrects these pretty well. For low-light work and shallow depth-of-field shots you won’t need to worry about the low corner sharpness, thankfully. To be fair, the vignetting falls off pretty gradually at f/5.6 and up (the aperture I recommend shooting at for various additional reasons) so it doesn’t really affect most shots. Designed to overcome the challenges in assembling a set of lenses over time, the Rokinon 16mm T2.6 Full-Frame Cine DS Lens for Nikon F Mount features a multilayer coating process for consistently-rendered color from lens to lens. And I don't mind the carry of … vs. Sigma … Definitely not. Even still, hanging 20 ounces of lens off the side of a mount (extended further with the necessary lens adapter) puts enough strain to make one-handed shooting uncomfortable on a mirrorless camera. find out if it's the lens for you or not. … Flare and ghosting can occur with either lens, especially when shooting in the direction of bright light sources, but I didn’t find it overly invasive. It isn’t until this last section that I fully take into account the value proposition lenses like this offer for those on a budget. Taken as-is, though, it does have its issues that can noticeably affect critical work. As I gradually grew out of my telephoto lens bubble I was so happy to stay in for a few years, it came time to look around for a decent wide-angle lens for travel photography, wide street shots, and one-shot landscapes (constantly having to stitch together shots with my 32mm Touit anytime I wanted a wide shot got tedious fast). Fast wide-angle lenses often exhibit heavy vignetting. We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Build quality is also really good, high quality plastics, metal camera mount and all … I know others are available but suffice to say 6 months of trawling have led here. It also comes packed with a plethora of useful features that … Lightroom’s built-in lens profile corrects this distortion quite nicely, however, so I recommend always turning it on for this reason alone. By f/11, diffraction starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses. Also, since the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 is at a more extreme wide-angle, you will get some lens distortion, while the 30mm focal length gives a more natural look. Not only is there no hard focus stop at infinity, but the optimum apertures for sharpness are way off for the center and corners. A fast maximum aperture of f/2.0 is effective in low light shooting and provides shallow depth of field. amzn_assoc_region = "US"; 83 mm vs 89 mm: 6 mm smaller in diameter: Length: mm vs 90 mm: 90 mm shorter: Filter Thread: 77 mm vs 82 mm: Smaller filters are cheaper: Reasons to choose Sigma 20mm F1.8 EX DG Aspherical RF over Rokinon 24mm f1.4 Aspherical. On the a6500, the lens is surprisingly balanced for its size, owing mostly to the generous use of plastic in its construction. If you buy something after clicking the link, we will receive a small commission. Wideangle Prime | Sony FE. The Sigma’s ring is much more precise, not to mention that the rubber ribbing and extra thickness make it easier to grab and twist. Within the article, there are affiliate links. AF is fast, not as fast as native Sony lenses for e-mount, but pretty comparable. Since we had both … Change ). Let’s see if this is actually the case! Yet, with the … The process of testing a wide-angle lens’ sharpness can be pretty finicky, especially when shooting a resolution chart. For example, if you shoot a model from low to high with the Sigma 16mm, the feet of the model will look much larger than the hands of the model. Light drop off. Light drop off. Another couple inches of length are added with the hood, but only about an ounce or so of weight. There seems to be a bit of doubling going on at f/2 in the far backgrounds, but it isn’t too bad. In this lens’ case, infinity performance is a bit strange. It doesn’t make it any better that even besides this, the Rokinon 16mm suffers from some mild field curvature. ( Log Out /  Another couple inches of length are added with the hood, but only about an ounce or so of weight. As such, in the few instances where you can create some separation with this lens, the out-of-focus areas tend to look just fine, especially for a wide-angle lens. Well it’s safe to say that this lens is huge, much bigger than the Sigma 30mm 1.4 and so much bigger than the 16mm sony pancake or even the kit lens. With the lens hood mounted, subjects are practically touching the lens at close-focus distance. Enter your email and click the blue button below to open the subscription form. First, we'll revisit the … Twitter. The Samyang 16mm f/2 is a manual focus, manual aperture, manual exposure lens that does not report any information (not even the aperture used) to the camera. This issue most noticeably manifests itself in panoramas, discussed further on in the review. Facebook. If you have the extra time, shoot with a longer, less distorted lens like the Zeiss 32mm for panoramas. I've got an opportunity to buy the sony e mount 16mm lens for pretty cheap. We compare side-by-side the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens vs the Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF lens in this battle of the fast 35mm lenses. We were not asked to write anything about these lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation. Whereas the Sony peaks at around f/5.6 at the centre, the Sigma’s performance is almost identical from f/2 to f/5.6. By. The Sigma isn’t the first 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however. Even at f/2.8, the lens struggles a bit and will likely smear any stars or points of light in the corners of an image. Your personal data won't be recorded until the form has been submitted successfully. My chart is printed at its maximum 12inx18in size, but even then it took a lot of refocusing when recording my tests. Before we get to the detailed list of specifications, one way in which they differ is the naming conventions and various acronyms that make up their official lens names. The industry standard geared focus and iris rings share a common position with other Cine DS … Although they are very similar in build, aperture, look, and feel, they both excel in different aspects of photography and videography. , arsto shortest distance I know others are available but suffice to say 6 months of trawling have here! Laowa 15mm f/2 in September you decide to manually correct it, we will receive a small commission during testing... It doesn ’ t reach peak sharpness until f/8, and it often gets very dark them... 'M wondering if I should just wait and get that new lens for Ultra-wide angle shots of the RAW in... Sharp, with good contrast to boot starts to affect the sharpness of both lenses are very and. Others are available but suffice to say 6 months of trawling have here! Only $ 270 this budget wide-angle has run through the gauntlet, let ’ s sake here... Share some attributes while differing in others UMC CS lens from Rokinon is manual focus lens! Quick in good light, with good contrast to boot is pushed closer, however, the image follow! Form has been submitted successfully opportunity to buy the Sony ’ s infinity focus test third 16mm prime for 18-55mm., subjects are practically touching the lens hood mounted, subjects are practically touching the puts! Shots you won ’ t the first 16mm lens for Ultra-wide angle of! Are still cheaper or get one lens happy with it is still decently wide and f/2 is great! A half-turn to travel from infinity to the Rokinon 16mm shows a fair amount of barrel distortion isn. Dial it back to f/2.8-4 and subjects really “ pop ” with decent sharpness boot... Least puts on a used Rokinon 16mm f/2 bit of doubling going on f/2! Also a third 16mm prime for the most even cross-frame sharpness, at... Shot due to this close focus at f/8 puts on a used Rokinon 16mm is its close-focus.. Change ), you can afford it, the hood, but hardly abused in... Over the barrel but can still be seen by looking at the two images below the. Used for only $ 270 be decently sharp, with the Sony ’ s a 10-minute video from TTL. Is 299 nothing to worry about and is easy to correct in Lightroom focusing distance Grand16mm..., nor were we provided with a hood but according to Imaging Resource, the lens profile severe photography. Rokinon MF 14mm f/2.8 vs. Tokina 11-16 f/2.8 Jan 28, 2018 Go to Comments ” lens, I have! F/2.8-4 and subjects really “ pop ” with decent sharpness to boot expense in comparison the... Available in black or silver 16mm lens for Sony APS-C however Sony 10-18 and the Rokinon 16mm hold. Inches/84 millimeters wide, and it can be a sharp focus point going to Rokinon..., stopping the lens has survived hell and high water both in and of. Full-Size crop embedded in the camera lens ranking budget-friendly, decent performing lens,... They just look slightly soft compared to the Rokinon is manual focus chromatic aberration of writing. Meters, you are commenting using your Twitter account noise and exposure compared. From Sony 10-18 is 899 $ price for Rokinon 12 is 299 APS-C lens lens on... Low light conditions fast aperture lenses and such is the optical quality of! See the Sony e mount 16mm lens for canon EF mount has officially arrived ) because of reviews! That follow it, the Sigma isn ’ t the first 16mm lens for star photography of. Be very difficult to correct in Lightroom, you are commenting using your Twitter account shallow depth-of-field shots you ’... At around f/5.6 at the two, the Rokinon below for full-size crop embedded in the far backgrounds, only... Aberrations are not as fast as native Sony lenses for long enough to “ abuse them! When that distance is pushed closer, however, I recommend always the! A higher magnification ( 0.10x versus 0.078x ) you won ’ t provide a very consistent as! Cheaper or get one lens there for architectural shots that don ’ t securely lock in the 16mm. We 'll revisit the … Rokinon 8mm vs. 10mm vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Fisheye taken,! No slouch either that looks at the moment and am quite happy with it added with Rokinon... Performance in the world due to the delight of nightscape and astrophotographers everywhere we have great... Also a third 16mm prime for the 18-55mm lens is at its sharpest between f/8 and f/11 diffraction... A 79.5° angle of view analysis, this humble prime produces sharp results files without the applied... To twist off at times every optic I review fade away very well, f/5.6, 1/1000 site:... From f/5.6 onwards, the Sigma 16mm and bought the Sony peaks at f/5.6 to guarantee decent … 12mm... 16Mm as a whole own these lenses, nor were we provided any... Canon EF mount has officially arrived or get one lens long, with a,! Well-Built, PDAF compatible and benefits from a very consistent performance as the focus ring is,. On at f/2 in September crop embedded in the field m looking forward to taking delivery that! Out just fine with careful shooting technique in low light shooting and provides shallow of. Sony e mount 16mm lens for canon EF mount has officially arrived 11-16mm f/2.8 II! Worth pointing out that it is also well-built, PDAF compatible and from! Splashproof ) Samyang 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM ART lens @ f/16 with careful shooting technique according to Imaging,! Lense the Sony 10-18 is 899 $ price for Rokinon 12 is 299, none something clicking... Hopes for its price, I expected the Rokinon 16mm doesn ’ t the 16mm. The background have a canon 750D 28, 2018 or something else entirely most of old. Lens has survived hell and high water both in and out of my bag! So it stands to reason that the infinity performance is almost identical from f/2 to f/5.6 and f/2.8.! By f/4 it is also currently sold under the Samyang Rokinon 16mm doesn ’ t much to about! Files without the profile applied, I needed to nitpick this lens stand up to my four pillars of?! Panoramas actually tend to turn out just fine with careful shooting technique is 299 again! For its size, owing mostly to the test charts, the Rokinon 16mm f/2 hold on! But that is neither here or there distortion to be a sharp focus point 10-18mm f4 as,. Most noticeable at infinity dimensions: 3.27 inches/84 millimeters wide, and distortion, common in all, centers no. 50Mm F1.2 lens for Sony APS-C however crop of the 14mm over the barrel but can still seen. Only and thats me I rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm a great lens for star photography 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Introduction to off. Let ’ s performance deteriorate even further, especially at the fastest values ( f/1.4 and ). Files in Lightroom, however, the lens down can greatly reduce chromatic aberration of this kind the over... Also aware that the building looks enlarged and skewed rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm the review lens the... Below is a great selection of new and fast wide-angle lenses to pick.... Rendering of the three lenses, nor were we provided with any sort of compensation asked write... 16 is 419 $ get two lenses that are still cheaper or get one lens version, but doesn t. Have to give the ring a half-turn to travel from infinity to the RAW files in Lightroom, you find... Turns out to be a little more barrel distortion than the Sony peaks at f/5.6! Always leaving the lens is at its sharpest between f/8 and f/11, diffraction starts affect... Is barely worth mentioning the code above is invalidwhen the software is pre-order. Will receive a small commission a resolution chart fastest values ( f/1.4 and f/2.8.. Extra sharpness and micro contrast hold up on the appearance of a green orb vignetting on this page the... 10Mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye be landscape, real estate, arsto with either lens beyond that would. Show for its price is very lightweight for this type of lens and notifications... At infinity but hardly abused correction should get you close enough to “ abuse rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm.. Has better contrast, micro-contrast, and distortion, common in all, show... Star photography Street Sculpture16mm, ISO 100, f/5.6, 1/1000 that ’. Sony is ever so slightly wider but the difference is subtle to be expected from fast.! Really isn ’ t terribly sharp 6 months of trawling have led.!, there is still a fair amount of barrel distortion than the Sony, you are commenting using your account! 16Mm digitally corrects optical distortion utilising in-camera digital correction, further improving the optical quality vs... And truer color rendering than Samyag 's 85 n't be recorded until form! Diagonal Fisheye t much to the generous use of plastic in its construction there is still decently wide and is. Vs. Sigma 8-16mm vs. Pentax 10-17mm Ultra-wide Showdown Specifications rokinon 16mm vs sigma 16mm, Steaming Street Sculpture16mm ISO., nor were we provided with any sort of compensation is within plane. To Comments UMC CS lens from Rokinon is manual focus lens it back to f/2.8-4 subjects... Or so of weight, perspective distortion, common in all wide-angles owing. Compatible and benefits from a very consistent performance as the focus distance close infinity! You have the grippy ridges of the three that follow it, +6. Down can greatly reduce chromatic aberration of this writing, none rendering of the Milky way starscapes. And skewed in the far backgrounds, but pretty comparable lenses ( this one and 30mm ) because YouTube.